Is Boom and Bust all We can Hope for?
IS BOOM AND BUST ALL WE CAN HOPE FOR?
Interview with Professor Colin Crouch, Warwick Business School
With the recent financial crisis still making headlines, it could be expected that the tide may turn against 'boom and bust' capitalism. Professor Colin Crouch, Warwick Business School and Author of The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism, disagrees suggesting that the ideology will continue to flourish, in spite of the financial crisis. Is there anything that can temper the domainance of our big corporations or is the neoliberal ideology here to stay?
The 1970s, 1980s and beyond saw the rise, and eventually dominance, of neo-liberalism in the West. This set of economic policies, championing a market-driven approach to monetary policy and advocating the transfer of control of the economy from the public to the private sector, held sway during the boom of the 1990s and the subsequent economic crash that followed in the 21st century.
According to Prof Crouch the economic crisis will not lead to a change in the neo-liberalist economic model because the structure of power in the Western world is such that those who have an interest to keep the system going are in a dominant position. “My prediction is that though the model is one that will continue to have crises because of the inherent instability of the financial model, people will just keep on putting it back on the road, fixing it, putting it back on the road because there’s no counter hegemonic.”
My prediction is that though the model is one that will continue to have crises... people will just keep on putting it back on the road...
The issue is one that Prof Crouch explores in his new book, The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism, to be published in June 2011. He says that often there’s confusion about how markets work. “What’s seen as an opposition between government or state, and the market, is actually frequently a triangular relationship between market, state and corporation.” Increasingly, following neo-liberalist ideals, corporations are involved in some sort of governance within society, despite the fact they have not been democratically elected to do so.
Corporations have taken on a form of governance in our society for a number of reasons. These include the fact that some giant firms compete in a number of sectors; the increasing role of networks such as distribution chains which enable corporations to drive out competitors; Western multinationals in developing countries gaining a prominence in that society beyond their role in the market; and the privatisation and contracting out of public services, supported by bodies such as the EU and World Bank, bringing corporations into the public decision-making process.
The idea that the private sector is more efficient than the public sector has risen with neo-liberalism. As a consequence persons from the private sector, encouraged by government, now play a role in advising public policy and the running of organisations. This is particularly the case in the UK. Yet this approach cannot be explained by the theory of the market or the theory of democracy. The nearest explanation is the theory of consumer welfare and large corporations which emerged as part of the general neo-liberal model in the 1970s and 1980s. This theory espouses the idea that it is in the consumer’s interest for there to be more wealth in society. Therefore if corporation mergers and acquisitions create wealth then this justifies the reduction of competition, even if inequality subsequently increases. Understandably, this is not a politically popular stance.
How can big business and the public good meet in the middle?
However, Prof Crouch says, in theory the interference of business in government is just as bad as the interference of government in business. So what is the way forward? How can big business and the public good meet in the middle?
This, says Prof Crouch, displaces the locus of political conflict away from government parties to a nebulous space, largely cyberspace due to the number of anti-corporation campaigns that begin online. Governments are in the business of electoral competition. Opposing a corporation is no use to a political party unless it embarrasses their opponents. With the advent of groups critically challenging the power of big business, a new politics of the corporation is developing.
Big businesses are not forced to be publically responsible and there is incentive for them to do anything other than maximise their own interests. According to Prof Crouch neo-liberalism, checked by strong campaign groups, “is quite likely the best politics we are going to get in a period increasingly dominated by the role of large corporations that governments daren’t say boo to very loudly”.
View the whole of Prof Crouch’s lecture below.
Leave your comments on the subject below. Do you think there any viable alternatives to the current set-up? What do you think is the worst aspect of the present structure? We are keen to hear your views.
Professor Colin Crouch is Governance and Public Management Fellow at Warwick Business School. Previously Professor of Comparative Social Institutions at the European University Institute, Florence. Also held positions at LSE and Oxford. Chairman of The Political Quarterly, and past President of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE). Fellow of the British Academy, member of the Academy of Social Sciences, and External Scientific member of the Max Planck Institute for Social Research at Cologne. Expert consultant to the Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development, OECD.
Related WRAP Articles
Berry, C. (Craig) (2008) International political economy, the globalisation debate and the analysis of globalisation discourse. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
Clift, Ben and Tomlinson, Jim (2007) Complexity constraint and New Labour's putative neo-liberalism: a reply to Colin Hay. British Journal of Political Science, Vol.37 (No.2). pp. 378-381. ISSN 0007-123
Clayton, Matthew, 1966- (2002) Liberal equality and ethics. Ethics, Vol.11 (No.1). pp. 8-22. ISSN 0014-1704
Haselip, James (2004) The globalisation of utilities liberalisation: impacts upon the poor in Latin America. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
Prof Nick Crafts, Director or Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) and Prof Lord Robert Skidelsky, Emeritus Professor of Political Economy, the University of Warwick discuss the current economic crisis.
Share Your Thoughts
Our ears are always open and we are looking forward to hearing what you think on the matters up for discussion, Share Your Thoughts with us.
Also on the Knowledge Centre
WBS has created a 'Blueprint for Success', a practical guide to implementing factors needed for recovery and growth.
Professor Lord Robert Skidelsky returned to the University to give a special lecture, available now on the Knowledge Centre.
Andrew Lilico argues that the eurozone debt crisis was a continuation of the wider banking crisis.